Wednesday, April 18, 2007

What's in a name?

I really doubt if William Shakespeare would've asked the same question, had his name been abbreviated to Shaky or Shak, and he was commonly summoned by his colleagues with this newly christened name during his times.

Last night I was talking to my roomie and he mentioned that he had a new teammate joining him soon. To quote him, "बड़ा अजीबसा नाम है यार उसका. मुझे तो pronounce भी करने को नही आता है ठीक से ... mri-na-li-ni. पता नही मेरे colleagues उसे क्या नाम से बुलाएंगे".

Dude actually stuttered a couple of times before he could get the pronunciation right - this coming from a desi was surprising. I wondered if good enunciation was one more thing I had been taking for granted all along. Generally speaking this should not be the case, because I dont think any Indian language is devoid of complex words using multiple compound alphabets (jod-akshare), and that growing up speaking our mothertongue we probably come across such words with an alarming regularity (although we tend not to notice them).

In today's world, where by and large most things are going Americana, everything has to be short, quick and efficient and this process does not spare first names either. I really feel for my southie people with names like muthukrishnan, jagannathan, unnikrishnan, balasubramaniam, rajgopalan, badrinathan and the likes. I feel more for them if these guys are working in an American workplace. Ask any firang collleague to pronounce their names in entirety and they'd rather buy lunch everyday than go through the hassle of pronouncing these tongue twisters.

Worse yet are the desi-chick-goes-hip episodes. Here Radhika becomes Rads, Sunaina becomes Su, Darshana becomes Dee and Pooja becomes Poo. I mean seriously?! Poo?!? Dont even care to think what the original name means and what the new hep cool name is (smelly) like? Poor Shaky would probably turn in his grave to know this. This, however, is self inflicted idiocy of the highest order and no one can sympathize.

I dont know what it is that makes these firangs so _ _ _ (stuck for a word here, really) that they can't bother to pronounce names that are more than 5 alphabet long. So we have a lot of Eric's, John's, David's, Sean's, Bill's and Tom's (3 alphabets; even better!) as common names in Dubya-land. If the name is longer than that be ready to chop some off, Elizabeth becomes Liz or Ellie or Lisa, Suzanne becomes Susie, William becomes Will or Bill, Margaret become Marge. Why? If you cant pronounce Indian tongue twisters I'll give it to you, but why not make an effort to pronounce atleast familiar names completely? Just doesn't happen.

My point is, there is much more to a name (and especially, an Indian name) than Shakespeare could have thought about some centuries back. It makes you known, it gives you an identity in the crowd, it is what makes you You. So wear your name with pride and make sure everyone pronounces it right (easy for me to say, I'm lucky enough to have a short name LOL)

5 comments:

Ranjeet said...

Amit,

Like the firangs, we in India also have this habit. Being a marathi, I will tell you what we do to our friends, you will find 'apabhransh' of a nice name everywhere - e.g. Rahul - rahulya, yogesh - yogya, nitin - nitya, sukumar- sukya, narendra - narya etc. - You go anywhere in Maharashtra towns, you will find this!
But a nice post and a nice and light topic! Lage Raho.

Unknown said...

Thats interesting....lemme tell you, U talking about America...What about Down Under?!! It's very common to find people using a different version of name!....Warne becomes Warnie, Hayden becomes Haydos, Barry becomes Bazza, Janet becomes Jazz, Sharon -Shazza,Marilyn becomes Mazza...I could go on and on....I guess it's becoming more of style to use a different name rather than the original name itself.On that note, I guess, Shaky..would have thought on the same lines when he said" What's in the name?":)

Amit said...

Thanks Ranjeet. I partially agree with you. When I wrote this post I was mostly looking at this topic from a professional workplace setting than a friend circle kind of an environment. But you're right I do that all the time too, guess I conveniently overlooked it:)

Rohan,
Hayden kharach bat gheun maidanaat haydos ghalto .. so tyacha naav apt aahe;) And if changing names is a style I guess I'd rather be old school.

Anyways, my main point in this post was my resentment against the shortening of 1st names rather than changing them entirely.

Unknown said...

Agreed mate,...But If the person doesn't mind being called by the shortened or the new name..then so be it;)...Well it all comes down to the individual.Innit?:)

Amit said...

Yes it probably does come down to the individual but this is MY blog and I get to write whatever I think [:D]

No big deal, at the end of the day, it is all vaayfal badbad ;)